|

September 11, Crisis Resolution
Articles
Interviews
Letters
Responses to September
11th
Speeches
Posted April 21, 2004
By Pamela Harris
|
|

Hurting Stalemate in the Middle East
(Dialogue Webpage for Conflicts Worldwide (DWCW) Newsletter - April 2004
Focus of the Month Piece)
By Dennis
J. D. Sandole
ICAR Professor and Fulbright Visiting Professor of International Studies,
Diplomatic Academy of Vienna
Sir, Philip Stephens' Financial Times article on the occasion of the
Israeli assassination of Sheikh Ahmed Yassin ("The targetted killing
of the Middle East peace process", March 26) brings to mind the situation
in game theory known as the "Prisoners' Dilemma". In the PD,
each of two conflicting parties continues to pursue its narrowly defined
interests in "win-lose" terms, with both winding up at the end
of the day less well off than they were before.
The "dilemma" is captured eloquently by the stubborn persistence
of Realpolitik-driven parties to continue pursuing "rationality"
and security at the expense of "the Other", even though the
results of such behavior are catastrophically counterproductive outcomes
in the presence of more productive, "win-win" options.
While the PD illustrates the "bite and counter-bite" nature
of action-reaction escalation, it does not capture the structural and
historical settings within which the moves and countermoves are being
played out to the detriment of all.
For Israelis and Jews worldwide, these include the experience and historical
memories of discrimination, pogroms and, immediately prior to the founding
of the Jewish state, the identity-shaping Holocaust. For Palestinians,
and Arabs and Muslims worldwide, the Jewish state was created -- and is
still being established -- at the total expense of the indigenous population,
resulting in their oppression, marginalization, criminalization, and military
occupation.
Each Palestinian suicide bombing rekindles Jewish fears of extinction,
while each Israeli military assault on an already occupied population,
with US-supplied jet fighters and helicopter gunships, furthers the sense
of Palestinian emasculation, humiliation, frustration, and rage.
The way to undermine the "psycho-logic" of the Prisoners'
Dilemma is not to continue to "fight fire with fire", thereby
making the fire worse, but to deal effectively with the underlying, deep-rooted
historical and structural factors that continue to drive both Palestinian
and Israeli actions and reactions.
Apparently, Israelis and Palestinians cannot achieve this on their own.
Hence, they desperately need help. This is precisely where the "Quartet"
-- the European Union, United Nations, United States, and Russian Federation
-- can play an effective mediative role. More importantly, "win-win"
rationality would demand that they should, if they really want to "win"
against global terrorism and prevent the PD from being transformed into
the "Game of Chicken", with disastrous implications for all
concerned.
|